SHANE STAY - Blog

2019 women's world cup closing words

7/10/2019

There have been great players on the men’s side, all throughout history. Greats like Pele, Maradona, Shane Stay. What? Seriously? You doubt me? Look, Bruce Arena’s list might go something like this: Pele, Maradona, Agoos. It’s all opinion really. Just opinion. And those differ. Moving on. Hold on, I don’t think I was better than Jeff Agoos. I know I was better than Jeff Agoos. Certain things are just facts. The Pythagorean theorem. Banks close at nighttime. Dogs have four legs. Let’s move on.
   On the women’s side, there have been greats as well. Players like Mia Hamm, Michelle Akers, Marta. Now, at the close of the 2019 FIFA Women’s World Cup, the list of greats continues to build with Alex Morgan, Tobin Heath, Megan Rapinoe, Rose Lavelle, Julie Ertz, Carli Lloyd, and every other player on this year’s team. Coach Jill Ellis was phenomenal as well. Following the championship in France, it’s the second World Cup title in a row and the fourth overall for the US. An outstanding accomplishment for US women’s soccer.
   Not one to brag (a-hem) but my prediction came true. I was one of many that foresaw the US winning the 2019 FIFA Women’s World Cup. Not the biggest surprise in the world, though, after all, it came true. The thing about the USWNT is that, like the men’s team in Brazil, it’s a team expected to win every time. So, a surprise the US won? No. But the competition was stiff. And, lo and behold, the competition is getting better each World Cup. Watch out next time around for Spain and Italy, to name a few. What’s taken them so long? Long story but they’ve finally come around. And it should be expected. Now that the women’s programs in those places are being taken more seriously, one would expect natural spillover from the men’s programs (which, in the case of Spain and Italy, are elite, top-class, state-of-the-art). So the US has a lot to think about come 2023. For the time being, the championship is in the US, where it belongs.
   The European season for the men is right around the corner. I’m excited to announce The European Soccer Leagues: Everything You Need to Know About the 2019-20 Season. It was an honor to write, just as it was with The Women’s World Cup 2019 Book (which, by the way, was such a thrill and honor to write and maybe, just maybe, the most gratifying thing I’ve published to date). For now though, the European club season will be a long, wonderful, journey. I look forward to it.
  Not to mention, soon, very soon, we’ll have the 2020 European Cup (telepathic high-five).
Let’s not forget, the MLS season is coming to fruition in the fall. The playoffs are right around the corner. All you need to know about the world’s next super league—yes, I said it and mean it—is in Major League Soccer 2019: Everything You Need to Know About the Teams.
For all intents and purposes, the 2019 FIFA Women’s World Cup captivated the world this year. After closing an epic adventure in France 2019, it’s time for the US women to celebrate the World Cup trophy for the next four years. They deserve it. It was another amazing World Cup. That should wrap it up for now.
  See you soon folks. Goodnight now.

Will US women’s soccer players get equal pay?

7/9/2019

A popular debate has arisen: Should USWNT players get equal pay to that of the USMNT players?
I was asked about this topic on KSRO radio during the 2019 FIFA Women’s World Cup. The games were underway in France and I was explaining on the radio that the US women had made some progress, such as hotel accommodations, but more was on the table to sort out. As CNN reported (on 7-7-19), the USWNT members have been in the process of potentially getting more pay. For example, had the USMNT won the World Cup (good luck, but just go with it here), each male player would have earned more than what each female player received from winning the 2019 FIFA Women’s World Cup. Regarding this topic, much more potential news should be around the corner. It’s a topic that will only get more interesting as time goes on.

Will the USWNT Visit the White House?

7/8/2019

Just when you thought World Cup excitement was over, things are getting more interesting by the minute.
Apparently, according to CNN (on 7-7-19), Megan Rapinoe, Alex Morgan and Ali Krieger are not attending a potential White House visit following the 2019 FIFA Women’s World Cup championship. President Trump said he hasn’t really thought about inviting the team. And, not to be outdone, there is talk of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and others in the House of Representatives possibly hosting a USWNT celebration visit in the nation’s capitol. Stay tuned.

2019 women's world cup predictions

6/23/2019

2019 FIFA World Cup Predictions:

Group F

United States vs. Thailand
Prediction: 15-0
Score: 13-0

United States vs. Spain
Prediction: 5-0
Score: 3-0

United States vs. Sweden
Prediction: 2-1
Score: 2-0

Round of 16
14 out of 16

I was very accurate. I only predicted two wrong choices. Those were South Korea and Scotland. These teams did not make the Round of 16. Instead, Cameroon and Nigeria did. Therefore, I was 14 out of 16. That's 88%. Or something like that. Too bad Ramanujan isn’t here. (Only the greatest mathematician ever.)

The teams I selected that did make the Round of 16 include: France Norway, Germany, China, Australia, Brazil, Japan, England, Canada, Netherlands, United States, Sweden, Spain and Italy.

New Prediction:
United States vs. Spain
Round of 16
June 24, 2019
Let’s just go for 3-0, US.
Score: The US won 2-1

Quarter-finals
5 out of 8

So far, I'm 3 for 4. I correctly predicted that Germany, Norway and France would advance to the Quarter-finals. England also advanced. I did not think England would.

The Quarter-finals are set. I was 5 out of 8.

My picks for the Quarter-finals that made it were:

France, Norway, Germany, US and Sweden.

The teams I did not choose were:

England, Italy and Netherlands.

Italy, who would’ve thought? Unfortunately, China and Japan, two of my top choices, didn’t make it past the Round of 16.

Correct Prediction!
United States vs. France
Prediction: 2-1
Score: 2-1
I correctly predicted the 2-1 victory in the US vs. France Quarter-final game on 6-28-19. Too good.

Semi-finals
1 out of 1

United States vs. England
Prediction: 2-0
Score: 2-1
So close!

Prior to the US vs. England game I made a prediction with a friend at George and Walt’s bar in Oakland, California. I said the US would probably win 1-0 or 2-0. I leaned toward 2-0. But I said I needed time to think about it. Lo and behold, I didn’t make it official online. Whatever. The score ended up being 2-1. I was close. Since I’m a “genius predictor” I take pride in my talents. Some people work at NASA, I predict soccer matches. We all play our part. In my case, I take pride in making my predictions as close as possible, like Maverick stepping on the brakes in Top Gun to allow his opposing plane to fly right by. He would time that risky maneuver within feet, maybe inches. I approach predictions the same way. You’ve gotta live a little dangerously.

Final
1 out of 1

United States vs. Netherlands
Prediction: 3-0
Score: 2-0

I predict a 3-0 US victory.

This prediction was tricky. Two of America’s top players, Rapinoe and Lavelle, were battling injuries. Would they play? Would they be instrumental on the field? So therefore, with them at less than 100% who knows? The Netherlands had a strong team leading up to this game. It was hard to tell. However, I went with a 3-0 US victory. (The prediction was made here on 7-5-19.)

Prior to the tournament, I predicted the United States would win the World Cup.

Prediction: I predicted that Thailand would finish last in the tournament.
Outcome: It would seem Thailand finished last in the tournament.

Prediction: I predicted that Marta would score 3 goals in the 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup.
Outcome: Marta scored 2 goals.

Meet and Greet
Talk soccer and World Cup predictions with me at Copperfield's Books in Santa Rosa, CA on 6-30-19, 1:30-3:00 PM. What to expect? I have bad posture, I have asthma and know a little something about soccer.

Keep up with all predictions in The Women’s World Cup 2019 Book: Everything You Need to Know About the Soccer World Cup.

book excerpt: The women's world cup 2019 book "var"

6/18/2019

VAR has been front and center in this exciting 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup in France.

The following is a book excerpt from The Women's World Cup 2019 Book:

VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
Any question as to whether VAR (Video Assistant Referee) should be used in the Women’s World Cup is frankly ridiculous. The women’s game should have it just as the men’s game does. The Women’s World Cup is making history, and VAR deserves a place at the table, rightfully so. It’s a new technology for soccer. Speaking of the 2018 World Cup in Russia, CNN reported, “…this is the first time in history that football has featured VAR at a World Cup.”[i]

Very quickly it became a sensation as millions of fans were discussing the pros and cons of advanced refereeing technology. Interestingly, at the 2018 World Cup in Russia, VAR operated like this: From a separate location, a VAR team of four officials viewed the games live with the help of cameras set up around the field. The head referee had a headset which allowed communication with the VAR team. Pretty simple. Information was relayed back and forth. And for important calls, including things like possible goals, ejections, penalty kicks, and offside situations, the technology was encouraged. Furthermore, a head referee has the option of going to a private viewing booth. This is the beauty of VAR.

Goal-line drama is all the rage with VAR. There was the famous situation in the 2010 World Cup down in South Africa that involved Germany and England. It was an elimination game. A huge game. And in the biggest moment of the game, Frank Lampard made what should have been a goal, which would’ve changed the outcome of the game, and possibly England’s whole tournament, and possibly the history of the World Cup, but without VAR, the referees couldn’t see in real time what millions of viewers from around the world saw on instant replay: a clear goal. The ball did go over the line. But the physics involved were exacting for even the most experienced referee. Thanks to the ball hitting off the crossbar, then crossing the goal line, then hitting the ground at an angle, the ball then bounced back into the field of play, so it was easy to see how a referee, along with his assistants, could miss such a call in real time. Still, VAR would’ve been nice to have.

Ejections by way of two yellow cards or a straight red card are huge reasons to have the assistance of the brilliant VAR. Here’s one really good example. Let’s say a particular player, Jessica, is playing with a yellow card. Then somewhere during a chaotic moment in the game, someone on the opposite team is fouled, and the referee mistakenly thinks that Jessica committed the foul, when, in fact, she didn’t. However, the foul is egregious enough for the referee to produce a yellow card, and it turns out to be Jessica’s second, which, by the rules of the game, dismisses her, and she has to miss the next match. However, with VAR, the referee can be told by the VAR team that Jessica was innocent after all. And the yellow card will eventually be given to the correct player.

Penalty kicks represent one of the biggest reasons VAR should be used. Was it a foul? Was it not a foul? Ostensibly, VAR can help in this regard. Sometimes a player who is really good at diving might use theatrical liberty to sell a call in the box. At a moment like this, a referee could very well miss the theatrics involved because everything was moving so fast, and in real time it’s sometimes hard to distinguish between a real foul and an Oscar-bound player. When everyone at home can see the flop, the referee is in a tough position. Yet, with VAR, the proper call can eventually be made.

If there’s a possible offside call, and the referees weren’t in position to get it right, then the VAR team can step in and help. Perfect. This assists referees immensely. What needs to be remembered with offside calls is that they represent one of the most difficult calls for referees to make. A player is considered offside if they are behind the last defender at the moment the ball is struck. This is the tricky part. Referees on the field are expected to determine an exact science almost, if we want to call offside such a thing. This is asking a lot of referees. Offside calls can be a really tough thing to get right. Coaches, players, and fans expect referees to get this exactly right every time, and that’s an impossible request. Let’s recap: The referees have to know exactly when the ball was struck and simultaneously know exactly where the last attacker was at the time of the ball being struck. This is very hard to determine on a regular basis with 100 percent certainty. Add to this, big moments in big games. VAR provides a fantastic option to get important offside calls right.

Some may wonder if VAR is not necessary until the elimination rounds. This is an interesting idea. After all, some of the teams in group play have little chance of success. This is a given. However, the following point is important (and to only say this is important is an understatement): Not having VAR in group play might affect teams that may advance far into the tournament. It could successfully be argued that teams like this should have the opportunity to win a group, or place higher in a group, for the sake of placement in the next round.

This makes the discussion of VAR in group play all the more intriguing. Should it be there? Should it wait until the elimination rounds? If we’re going to rely on the referees only during group play, then some teams might have room to complain if a call doesn’t go the right way. After all, if the fate of a team’s tournament is up in the air during a questionable goal-line call in the group stage, then VAR should definitely be present during group games. Waiting to use VAR during the elimination rounds only could deprive a team in the group stage of a chance to move into the elimination rounds. This is why it would make sense to implement VAR from the beginning of the tournament all the way to the end. And again, these points just add to the interesting discussion at large, one which certainly has occupied circles within FIFA.

What’s the value of VAR in the first place? Often times, if not all the time, when it comes down to a goal-line call, referees have a hard time knowing if the ball completely went over the line or not. This is the key. Referees cannot be expected to have perfect vision or be in just the right location to make such a critical call every time. Referees are human, which is why the Video Assistant Referee has become so valuable. It’s a great tool to use; it only takes a few minutes to double-check a call; and by using it, the integrity of the game remains strong. Another strong argument in favor of using VAR is that it takes a lot of pressure off the referees; it’s stressful enough officiating a game, and to have the safety net of VAR is good for the overall sanity of referees. They already have fans screaming at them, along with coaches and players. So to have VAR ready, which acts as the ultimate final say on tough decisions, is a good thing for the referees. It allows them room to relax and calmly concentrate on the game in its entirety.

By and large, VAR should be in use. Whether it should be in the group stages or first make an appearance in the eliminations rounds is another question altogether.

[i] (CNN), “What is VAR? The Video Assistant Referee explained,” CNN.com, updated June 19, 2018, accessed January 31, 2019, https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/19/sport/var-video-assistant-referee-world-cup-russia-2018-int-spt/index.html

book excerpt: the women's world cup 2019 book

6/13/2019

The 2019 Women's World Cup is underway and soaring high with excitement.

The following is a book excerpt from The Women's World Cup 2019 Book:

FIFA announced the draw for the groups on December 8, 2018. Andrew Keh of The New York Times wrote, “At a glitzy ceremony Saturday night at La Seine Musicale, a performing arts venue in the western suburbs of Paris, the tournament’s 24 teams were placed into four pots based on their world rankings and then drawn into one of six groups. With the exception of Europe, which has the most teams in the field (nine), countries from the same confederation could not be drawn into the same group.”[i]

Now that things are off and running, the Knockout Rounds are right around the corner. For now, group play is living up to the billing. The US got off to a great start. Brazil is regrouping. Australia is playing well. South Korea is definitely regrouping, despite playing extremely well. France is in a good position. Germany's looking strong. There's much more to come as things are only getting started!

[i] Andrew Keh, “U.S. Draws Sweden, Thailand and Chile at 2019 Women’s World Cup,” The New York Times, published December 8, 2018, accessed January 11, 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/08/sports/womens-world-cup-draw.html

2019 women's world cup predictions

6/13/2019

In this 2019 World Cup, Marta will score three goals.

The USWNT vs. Chile is a tricky prediction. The US will win, however, Chile has some technical ability and a belief in itself. It's a team that seems to expect something more. It also has a very good keeper. The score will be either 3-0, 5-0 or 7-0. While I feel like it will be 5-0, the safe bet would be 3-0. But I don't do safe; I'm the Maverick of Women's World Cup predictions. Ice Man's out there somewhere making his bets and I'm making mine. I imagine Ice Man's playing it safe. Not me. Who says the Women's World Cup can't do without a Top Gun reference? What's that? What's that younger audience? "What's Top Gun?" Only the best movie ever. Moving on. I should say 4-0 but I'm going with 5-0.

st. louis blues: stanley cup champions

6/12/2019

St. Louis Blues

us vs. thailand prediction, so close!

6/11/2019

United States vs. Thailand
2019 FIFA World Cup
Group F

My prediction heard on KSRO Radio with Pat Kerrigan, Sonoma County's News Talk: 15-0.

The actual score: 13-0.

How close can you get? C'mon US, get two more! Haha. Let's be honest: this might as well be a correct prediction. How close can I get? I'll chalk it up as a winner. Great game from the US. My prediction came so close, but, more importantly, the US had a phenomenal opening game and proved, for now, that it's the best in the world. Much more to come from this high-flying US team. Up next is Chile, which should be an interesting game to say the least.

2019 women's world cup prediction

6/10/2019

United States vs. Thailand

Prediction:

United States Thailand
503 0

Realistically, 7-0, 9-0 or 15-0 wouldn’t be surprising. One thing that might make it a low scoring game (though I doubt it) would be Thailand creating a human wall around its box which would cause the US trouble in terms of actually finding good chances at goal. Also, it will depend on how nice the USWNT will be. If the score is literally 13-0, and there's five minutes left in the game, the USWNT might ease up a little bit. Let's go out on a limb. The actual prediction is:

United States Thailand
15 0

<<Previous

2019 women's world cup closing words

Will US women’s soccer players get equal pay?

Will the USWNT Visit the White House?

2019 women's world cup predictions

book excerpt: The women's world cup 2019 book "var"

book excerpt: the women's world cup 2019 book

2019 women's world cup predictions

st. louis blues: stanley cup champions

us vs. thailand prediction, so close!

2019 women's world cup prediction

Archives

Author

Categories