SHANE STAY
  • Home
  • Blog
  • About the Author
  • Where to Buy
  • Press

making strides for the eventual title

12/21/2014

5 Comments

 
Picture
Better one-on-one skill

Avoiding one-on-one situations needs to be a thing of the past. How do we get around this? We encourage dribbling. Don’t yell at players if they lose the ball. Don’t scream and pout if players dribble. “Creativity takes courage, ” Henri Matisse. We have the Breitner’s and Rivaldo’s, however, they keep getting fed the same message: “Cut it out.” And they will continue receiving that message as long as the soccer culture remains the same.
   
   A few keys to making one-on-one skill better are: individual rehearsal of moves; one-on-one simulations; a cultural understanding and acceptance that dribbling must be done more; acceptance of failure; style in dribbling.
   Our basketball culture has everything right. We take the best dribblers, and make them good passers (most of them already are), which is the make-up of the NBA. Soccer has to adopt that mentality. If they dribble too much, then that’s for the coach to figure out. Let the players play, and dribbling should be a “green light” for them. The mental side to this is most important. Allow the dribbling and it will work out in the long run. Construct schemes in practice to implement dribbling to the point where it becomes normal. One-on-one competition should be a regular routine. Actors in a play or a movie don’t read the script once or twice and then jump right in. I’m sure they can, and I’m sure it’s been done, but the best method would be to memorize the lines, and from that point, once that has been established, the actors can go off script and improvise, and always be able to return to the script from there. And the best way to know, and memorize, the lines, is to practice by repetition. The director has a story to tell, and he or she will probably be okay with a little improvisation as long as the actors have the story in mind. After all, in plays there are times when a mistake will be made, or an actor forgets their line, and improvisation is the only way to get back on track. In movies, improvisation might be a technique used to enhance the scene. Either way, the actors must have the main line of the story in mind, to keep it in line with the director’s vision, and the best way to achieve this is to know the lines by memory, hence, repetition in rehearsal. In soccer, you have to approach one-on-one skill the same way. Dribbling is often improvisational, and at some point the players must fall back in line with the script – or the structured passing system they should be familiar with. Dribbling (and the passing system) must be rehearsed over and over, until the players get sick of it. It has to be engrained in their muscle memory. You can’t expect a player to do one-one-one drills for one-fourth of a practice, only one day in the week, and step into a game and perform. It’s insanity. There are thousands of people showing up for games. All eyes are on the players. Crowds can sense fear, or stage fright, in a heart beat. Everyone’s going to be somewhat nervous. Lawrence Olivier threw up before every live performance. He was the best actor of his day. No matter who you are there will be some stage fright. Practice is the best place to get the jitters out. Some think scrimmaging in practice is enough and others set aside actual one-on-one simulations. The one-on-one simulations need to be a stronger focus for American teams. This and the understanding from everyone – players, coaches and fans – that dribbling will be a constant artifice in games is the next important step in getting the players comfortable with consistently taking the spot light in big games. 


Picture
Breitner, a good one-on-one attacker, in action. Youtube "West Germany full games" for footage.
5 Comments

four year review 2014-2018

12/20/2014

6 Comments

 
Picture
The Four Year Review: America's Quest for the Cup

The Four Year Review begins now. This is a review of each national team game, from the men's side, from 2014-2018, preparing for the upcoming World Cup. We take a look at what went wrong, what went right, and everything in between. 

Note: 
Women's soccer program - you're on the right track! You have a handful of victories. Just as in grade school the guys are trying to keep up. I think you'll learn from this review, from all the mistakes, and all the mishaps, which will put into perspective all the things you might be "doing right." Some women's games will be covered, but really, as a compliment, you've got it covered. You're not so much a work in progress. The guys team is like the before shot from Queer Eye for the Straight Guy - he's got tattered jeans that are ten years old, mismatch socks, a shirt that he uses for work, the gym, nights out on the town and weddings. And, he doesn't know it's a fopaw, or, however you spell it. What do we do? If David Beckham (see photos) is the "biggest metrosexual in Britain," as he's known in England, we hire the "biggest metrosexual south of Britain, or north of Compton" (whichever way you want to look at it) Jurgen Klinsmann, who's a metro with an accent; he quickly re-arranges the uniform, selecting a whole new wardrobe for the coaching staff, with a very cultured, European touch; all looks ranging from modern-sheik, to Ivy league school boy, 1925. He recognizes there's a lot of work to do. As he should. As there is.  

United States vs Korea Republic
2-1-14
Friendly 
2-0 
Stub Hub Center, Carson, California
Attendance: 27,000

Korea, whether it be North or South, has had a string of good World Cup appearances starting with "the biggest upset" over Italy in 1966, the claim to fame of almost knocking Maradona out of the 1986 tournament, and a very good showing in 2002 when they had one of the best teams on any given day. Their fans were not in full support - as they were in 2002, lifting their team to a higher ground, with chants that made the English supporters look like a barber shop quartet - and on this day they lost an interesting contest, to the host 2-0. Both teams looked focused. Not much of a window-shattering event. 


Known by the English media as the "biggest metrosexual in Britain."

Picture

When you do enough photo shoots, some are bound to go wrong. "Hug the rope. David, just hug the rope. Trust me. Great look," says the "experienced" photographer. "And then get in the tub with this random guy."





Picture
Picture
Picture















Men's and women's teams have four years to look forward to with fresh uniforms.

6 Comments

once upon a time, ireland

12/19/2014

1 Comment

 
It seems like a long time ago when the USMNT had a hard time against anybody. This was when only a few people knew soccer - a few as in maybe it was played at camp, some recreational league or a relative told them the rules of the game during a vacation. As the years go on, just because parents have playing experience, and they’re enthusiastic about it, doesn’t mean that we’re going to be great. It’s imperative that we adopt more progressive ideas toward the game. You can love it all you want, but this does not guarantee success. Look at Mexico, Chile, Paraguay and even Uruguay. Uruguay is the best threat of the bunch, but they’ve fallen off so much, and they play with such a lack of flair. There’s something so boring to their approach. They just grind it out, fighting for space, providing a glimpse of ingenuity every so often. Chile, the same. Paraguay, even less so. Mexico, ditto. All these nations love the game much more than we currently do, and they are presently subjected – depending on who you ask – to being the underdog playing against the U.S. For arguments sake, it would at least be an even match. This was far from the case years ago. Prior to the inception of the MLS, our big victory was a friendly match against Ireland, in the early 1990s. And this was a big deal. You thought: Ireland? We can’t beat them, right? After all, in the 1980s, we were slugging it out with El Salvador and Jamaica – with a nervous eye on Bermuda – for the right to claim fifth place within CONCACAF. To beat Ireland was pretty big. They were a “European” team, not one of the dinky CONCACAF grouping of burly men we were used to. And no one was throwing batteries at our players, reminding them how the Panama Canal gave their great-grandfather gout. Thanks to the MLS we can produce confident players – who might not be doing the right things all the time, and who might have received the wrong message throughout their lives – who are athletic enough to demand good results against CONCACAF and, respectively, any team in the world. Once upon a time, we beat Ireland. It looked good. Just as it should. But we can never leave our neighborhood. It starts with a "C" and ends with a "F," somewhere in between we should take what's left. 
1 Comment

mocking the mls

12/18/2014

1 Comment

 
Though the Europeans mock the MLS as a retirement lot for aging thirty-year-old talent, it has “a place.” By “a place,” I literally mean it’s “there.” Without it, the pool of national team players – albeit current or potential players – would not have a chance to compete at a level higher than college. Without this opportunity it gets very difficult to achieve a level of performance, and expectations, worthy of staying on the field with top teams from Europe and South America. It just isn’t possible. Back in the 1980s, when American soccer was edging its way closer and closer to a highly competitive level, there were players like Rick Davis, a young Tab Ramos and Brent Goulet – all talented players who would’ve been “more talented” players had they been permanently raised in Holland or Argentina (excluding Ramos, raised in South America). They had the disadvantage of being trained within the college game. Competing against international teams was very lopsided – the rest of the world has been competing in their own professional leagues for close to one hundred years. It’s not so much how good they could have been, it’s more of what they were used too. It just wasn’t fair. France, the winner of the European Cup in 1984 would be a fine wine, while American players were empty bottles of beer on the side of the road, tossed out the window by a trucker that shouldn’t have been drinking and driving. The kind of bottle liberal trash scavengers will collect in a ditch ten years later, lamenting, “If only this could’ve been recycled earlier.”
   The other teams possessed simple skills, elements of technique that we were impressed with. Little things like kicking the ball off a player’s leg for a throw-in, chipping the ball over a player’s foot as a dribble – all things American players were aware of, but still impressed, nonetheless, when seeing other teams doing it so casually, without any effort, or thought. They just did it. We noticed them doing these things. This alone shows how far we've come. To us, they were doing it instinctually, whereas, our players would have to remind themselves of it. We noticed also, they were so comfortable in front of goal. They finished with ease. They were raised around the game, in the backyards and streets, playing with older guys that had professional experience; and there were pro leagues awaiting them. It was a totally different culture. A culture that produced seasoned players – from the miniscule skills, onward to the larger macro ideologies of the game, including possession for possession’s sake.  The MLS has changed that to an extent, with better things to come...

1 Comment

college soccer

12/8/2014

3 Comments

 
Thank you Rich, for your thoughts on American college soccer. 
   College soccer has traditionally been one of our best outlets for competition. We are unique in this respect, as the rest of the world favors a system of professional farm teams. Youth players grow up in a system provided by one of the professional clubs. When they graduate high school, the usual course of action is to play professionally, at some level, as opposed to the American road which typically is straight to college, before playing professionally. The college system is great, and it has provided the United States that "semi-professional" league we've lacked for so many years. As a youngster, I saw one of the best games you could see, on par with France-Germany 1982, or France-Brazil 1986. It was around 1990, in a game featuring two of the most storied programs in U.S. history, Indiana and SLU, with outstanding players on the field ranging from Chad Deering, Kenny Snow, Mark Santel to Brian McBride. These were the guys I emulated coming up and I only hope a little of their game was reflected in the way I played. The place was packed and they put on a show; there was some serious talent on the field and when I say it was a good game - with out a doubt - these guys brought it. "Everybody" my age wanted to play like them. In the 1980s and before even, there were few chances for players to play professionally. The NASL, and the MISL - which rode in on the waves of excitement from the New York Cosmos - were about it. Players from the generations of Bob Bradley, Bruce Arena, Jerry Yeagley (and even earlier; former President Bush Sr. played for Yale), didn't have many options, other than college. During those days, it was the highest outlet for players. Unfortunately, the U.S. was definitely in the dark ages of soccer back then. Things have improved dramatically as more and more American players are getting opportunities to play in the domestic professional leagues - MLS, USL, indoor and various off-shoot outdoor leagues - and a few players - a few more than in the 80s or 90s - play abroad. The college system provides a competitive outlet for domestic players, allowing some to receive scholarships, and bringing many foreign players here to enhance their education. There are still some campuses that lack a soccer program largely because the administration does not see enough money coming in from game related revenue. This, of course, has a lot to do with the popularity factor of U.S. soccer, or lack thereof. With its continual growth - seeing the expansion of the MLS, and the exuberant sell outs, from teams like Portland or Seattle - soccer is nudging its way to being the fourth most popular sport in the country. It used to be tennis, but that's falling quickly, at least, in comparison to the popularity of tennis in the pre-90s era. 
   We're stuck in a system that does not have as many professional outlets as many European nations. Because we don't have many professional soccer opportunities available, partly because the rest of the world is still on the fence when it comes to respecting the American talent level, the competition is even greater than in other places. A lot of players are competing for a small number of openings. In that regard, college is a great asset. Whether Universities provide a soccer team or not, soccer is growing so rapidly I would think those that don't have a team will change that in order to accommodate the vast amount of players that have a desire to represent their school. 
3 Comments

comfort zone gone

12/4/2014

5 Comments

 
American soccer's great, here in America, with rivalries and good leagues, from youth, to high school, to college, to the pros. It's once we step out of our comfort zone, and into the rest of the world, we realize we're not so great. 
   "Stop Letting the History of the Top Teams be Better Than You” 
   This idea that Brazil, Germany and Italy – the leaders in World Cup titles – are better than us based on their track record should be respected, but approached from a different viewpoint. If we had five titles to our brand we’d use that and reflect on the fact that we’ve won five titles, and the players of yore have passed on their knowledge of the game to the next generations. Whoever puts on the jersey should know they are there for good reason, and the symbolic act of wearing that jersey automatically gives them confidence over other nations that have not won World Cup titles. This is the advantage the aforementioned nations have over us. No matter how hard you try, you cannot strip them of their confidence. They are the established forerunners of the game. They are the trendsetters. However, we can’t allow that fact to keep us out of the mix. The way to get into that mix, is to shrug aside their history, have a belief in what you’re doing, and be excited to play the best teams. The way they beat other teams is the way you’re going to defeat them: looking forward to one-on-one encounters, good possession, patience in possession. We have the defensive part of the game down. Our defenders can defend. Our players are just as athletic as any other nation playing. That’s not the issue. It’s controlling the ball within the framework of long-term possession that is one of the main detractors to our progress. We also psyche ourselves out. We approach the top teams with too much reverence. We’re not Madagascar, after all. No offense Madagascar. We’re an Olympic Gold Medal hoarding nation. We have so many Gold Medals that we could quit competing for eight years and we’d still be on top of the winners list. America’s an athletic nation that dominates every other sport, except soccer. That can change, that will change, but, it starts with a coach, and the belief from fans alike, emphasizing the goal of entering the World Cup is to win the World Cup, not just have a good showing. 
5 Comments

outside defenders

12/1/2014

 
Outside Defenders

   So much can be said about theory, and the practical approach to a game. It can get a little boring for some. You should be able to apply a game strategy, or some idea about the game, to a team from any generation. At the same time, there is a lot to be said about which players are available at any given time. People around the world have complaints about lineups that go back twenty years and more. Some Italians still can't figure out why Signori didn't play as much in the 1994 World Cup. Riquelme and Ronaldinho didn't make their teams in 2010, with much speculation. There will always be disagreements, and different approaches, but the common thread to building a good team should be the skillful back line, with the ability to attack on offense. 
   Right now, in this era, the United States men’s lineup should look something like this:

                                                  Redondo

   
Eddie Jones   Time Ream    Michael Bradley   E. Buddle

                      (B. Convey)                                                    (Zussi)
Freddy Adu     Jose Torres                Stuart Holden            A. Yedlin 

                      Clint Dempsey           Breck Shea

   Whereas, in the olden days, some twelve to fourteen years ago, for the American soccer fans familiar with those times, it should have looked something like this (considering they were active around the same time):

                                                    Friedel

                      (Thomas Dooley)                                         (Cobi Jones)
Roy Lassiter      C. Reyna          Eddie Pope                         Josh Wolff

Donovan           Chad Deering            Joe Max Moore        Chris Henderson

                                           Clint Mathis   Preki

   I only hope that a cynic will look at these lineups, scoff, laugh, and shrug it aside as lunacy. For one, America’s proven that it can stay consistently mediocre in World Cup rounds; so, why not try something completely different than what we’ve been doing? And, secondly, they’re dead wrong. 
   In a few years, when these guys can’t play anymore there will be new players wearing the uniform. If they’re playing outside defender they should look like Yedlin, Cafu or Philipp Lahm. Usually these guys are forwards that get transitioned to outside defender. Lahm or Cafu could be very good forwards for some team out there. It so happens they’re outside defenders, which is a good thing. The outside defenders need to be former forwards. They need to have an attacking skill set; an attacking mindset. They need to have good ball skills. They need to be quick, fast and crafty. Former U.S. players that could have been very effective outside defenders would be Josh Wolff, Cobi Jones, Roy Lassiter. 

   The outside defenders need to be encouraged to attack. As the play is building up with possession on the left side of the field, the outside right defender should be ready to make an overlapping run past the outside midfielder, or forward on the right side. This pass won’t happen every time, but it should be there as a conscious option for all the players. Often the outside defender is stationary, so to speak, completing the swing of possession from one side of the field to the other. They’re like the wall on one side of the field, hugging the sideline, giving their teammates the means to pass the ball from one sideline to the other, and while this is happening they should also be alert to make those overlapping runs, possibly releasing a through pass to cause danger in the opponent’s end. (Whether this turns out to be a one on one with the goalie, a chance to set up a teammate with a pass for a shot, or, cause for the player to retreat and re-establish possession is another issue.) The best players to make these attacking runs and to accept these passes are former forwards. When they’re put into attacking positions their instincts to create good scoring opportunities are naturally going to be better than over-trained, lifetime defenders. Former forwards are better suited to dribble at opposing defenders, creating more interesting chances at goal. And this is what American soccer lacks: interesting play. Over the years, when you look at the players, the talent is there, in the form of a large pool of players waiting to go in, however a lot of the positions were filled with heavy-footed defender types. Time and time again foreigners reflect on the American style of play and they say it lacks a certain “something.” They’re correct. It’s hard to put a finger on it, but they’re right. We are usually athletic enough to defensively keep the score close. I don’t think defense is our number one cause for concern. American players lack a certain confidence, a certain style, a certain swagger. When it comes to basketball we have way too much confidence, style and swagger. Even country boys from Indiana or Iowa have a flair they stole from Isiah Thomas. The U.S. can field any basketball team and it’s going to look right. Not everybody from America is going to dominate like Lebron, but whoever you throw on the court they’re going to know what they’re doing, and it will show to any observer.
   So why can’t we get it right with soccer? Why do we lose any swagger we might have had when we go up against Argentina or Brazil? They psyche us out, that’s why. They look down on their opponent. They’ve already decided, based on past success, that they’re the standard. There is no higher. If they’ve decided this, you can’t take it away from them. When they look down on another team, that other team is hurting psychologically. If you show a little swagger and they look at you like you’re a punk, you’re going to feel like a punk. And then you look over to your teammates and they have the same look on their face, and in their body language; now everybody has admitted defeat. “Brazil’s better. If we show an moves we’re just stealing it from them.” Whereas, to the contrary, the attitude needs to be firm across the team: Everybody has to be skilled in the first place. That’s the prerequisite to get on the national team. Must have skill, must have dribbling moves, must want to use them.
   Then the team has to be united together, in win or loss, and take on the “better team” for the duration of the game, not giving an inch. If you let them punk you out, they’ll be glad to punk you out and leave you thinking you shouldn’t have played the sport in the first place. It’s similar to the lesser known Charles Barkley and Chuckie Brown story. Chuckie Brown was one of those NBA players you never heard of. He was one of the bench players. During a game against Barkley’s team Brown got subbed in and Barkley said, “Chuckie who?” I don’t think Chuckie had a good game. I don’t think his confidence was too high. What Chuckie needed was for his teammates to back him up, dish him the ball, allowing him to get touches, creating a little confidence. The game plan might have been different; Chuckie may have been designated to only set picks – I don’t know. But as an individual, Chuckie needed to get some boards, get a little physical – something to put Barkley in his place. You can’t be a “Chuckie who?” Don’t let Germany, Brazil or Argentina “Chuckie who?” you. 

    Shane stay +   
    ​(archives)     

    May 2025
    March 2025
    December 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    April 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    October 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014

    Author

    Shane Stay, author of This Is Our CITY, THE World Cup 2022 Book, THE World Cup 2018 Book.

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

    All Written Work Copyright   © 2014-2025 Shane Stay 
    KEY
    (NS) refers to "Non-Soccer" related blog entries, stories and essays, which may or may not appear. If you've read this far, you're probably not a robot. 

    CONTACT
    See PRESS Page
    .

Proudly powered by Weebly